Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
Suddenly, Professor Liebowitz realizes he has come to the seminar
without his duck ...
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the Industrial automation department...
SCADA vs. MES
Software, including programming, OS issues, etc. topic
Posted by ketan3k on 1 July, 2008 - 1:02 am
How can we provide a baseline on selecting MES systems or SCADA systems? What are the factors that lead to the selection of MES systems & which cannot be implemented in SCADA?


Posted by wboyes on 2 July, 2008 - 12:19 am
First of all, SCADA systems are NOT MES systems. The two are very different sets of software, with completely different end uses and design objectives.

Many of the SCADA/HMI software companies, and many DCS companies provide MES software to go from Level 2 to Levels 3 and 4 of the Purdue Model of Manufacturing.

SCADA and DCS systems operate at Level 1 and Level 2 of the Purdue Model. MES systems are "middleware." In fact, it appears that MES as an acronym (Manufacturing Execution Systems) is being phased out, even by MESA, the organization that cares about such things, in favor of other acronyms. One I'm particularly favorable to is "MOM" or "manufacturing operations management."

Walt Boyes
Editor in Chief
Control and Controlglobal.com
www.controlglobal.com
Mailto:wboyes@putman.net
Read my blog SoundOFF!! At www.controlglobal.com/soundoff


Posted by Ralph Mackiewicz on 3 July, 2008 - 10:41 pm
Is MESA gonna change their name to MOMMA (Manufacturing Operations Management and Messaging Association)? ;-)

BTW, in the IT world MOM = Message Oriented Middleware. MES would be considered an application that uses middleware (MOM) to integrate with other applications like customer information systems, etc. IMHO, MES would be less confusing.

Ralph Mackiewicz
SISCO, Inc.


Posted by Nathan Boeger on 3 July, 2008 - 12:25 am
You can begin by clearly defining your requirements based on your process and user interaction. What are you trying to accomplish?

There is a wide gray gap between MES and SCADA. I don't think you can definitively say that MES packages do X and that SCADA packages do not - or vice versa. Again, it goes back to your specific needs.

----
Nathan Boeger
http://notanotherindustrialblog.blogspot.com


Posted by Vipul Shah on 5 July, 2008 - 11:38 am
The SCADA Systems were conventionally more geared towards only Monitoring and Control operations. However modern SCADA systems do come with more advanced features like Data Collection,Reporting and Scripting capabilities to achieve functions like Integration with Production Management Systems etc. So,such systems do support features that overlap with MES atleast to some extent.

If we follow the evolution of the software in the Manufacturing World, it seems that Level 2 and Level 4 products both have tried to extend to the Level 3 - MES Level to provide features related to Manufacturing Operations Management.
We ourselves have done many MES-like projects which involve reporting and enterprise integration at a production line level using SCADA components and custom scripting like VBA and .Net.

When you talk at this level, there are some SCADAs which offer more flexibility to do these jobs. For e.g. Factory SQL/PMI is definitely much open in this regard.

However when we talk at the plant level, where talking with many varied systems is involved including Process Automation Systems, Quality Systems,Enterprise Systems then the full blown MES products with many differnt modules to perform various functions like Production Scheduling, Operations Management are the ones that are implemented by production companies.

Vipul Shah
vipul@egenietech.com
http://www.egenietech.com


Posted by ketan3k on 18 July, 2008 - 1:46 am
Hi Vipul,

Thanks for your input, I need to carry out only a few operations like product tracking, calculating TAKT time, cycle time & downtime. Do you feel that only for these options I should go with an entire MES suite or can a suitable SCADA do it?


Posted by Vipul shah on 3 August, 2008 - 3:29 pm
Hi Ketan,
The functionality you are looking to accomplish is surely achievable using a SCADA system with some cusotm application developed on top of it using VB or .Net.

One of the options you can look for is the Factory SQL/PMI SCADA system from inductive automation http://www.inductiveautomation.com
This system is truly open in the way that it allows you to build production tracking,downtime,reporting functionality into the system.

Vipul shah
vipul@egenietech.com

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!