L
Hello,
When using a cylindrical rotor of lets say 1 pole pair, to produce a 50hz frequency it needs to rotate at 3000rpm (50cycles per second). while if you're using a salient pole rotor with say 10 pole pairs, the rotation speed needs to be much less, at 300rpm.
Now I understand that if you increase the fuel flow rate you will get a larger current at the output, because it will be locked to the grid at 50hz. an increase in speed of the turbine, the torque generated will be converted to amps.
But which turbine is more suitable to run at 3000rpm and 300rpm? there must be something that works better at a higher/lower speed, as you can't have everything in life.
With regards to the generator, i know that it is mounted onto the stator, which is rotating to produce the required voltage at the output. but how do you get the DC current, since if it's rotating, you'll have AC current, you'll need rectification to get DC current no?
Cheers
When using a cylindrical rotor of lets say 1 pole pair, to produce a 50hz frequency it needs to rotate at 3000rpm (50cycles per second). while if you're using a salient pole rotor with say 10 pole pairs, the rotation speed needs to be much less, at 300rpm.
Now I understand that if you increase the fuel flow rate you will get a larger current at the output, because it will be locked to the grid at 50hz. an increase in speed of the turbine, the torque generated will be converted to amps.
But which turbine is more suitable to run at 3000rpm and 300rpm? there must be something that works better at a higher/lower speed, as you can't have everything in life.
With regards to the generator, i know that it is mounted onto the stator, which is rotating to produce the required voltage at the output. but how do you get the DC current, since if it's rotating, you'll have AC current, you'll need rectification to get DC current no?
Cheers