Today is...
Monday, July 24, 2017
Welcome to Control.com, the global online
community of automation professionals.
Featured Video...
Featured Video
A tutorial introduction to programming using the QuickBuilder Programming Environment.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Visit our Post Archive
Calibration vs Ranging
The difference between the calibration and re-ranging of a pressure transmitter.

Thoughts on the difference between the calibration and re-ranging of a pressure transmitter. Take a rosemount 3051 smart transmitter recently calibrated to measure flow 0-100m3/hr with sq/rt being applied at the trip amp.

Now, a few weeks later, the trip amp is removed from the loop, the range is changed to 0-200m3/hr and sq/rt is applied in the transmitter head.

The question is: should the transmitter now have a function test conducted on it such as having its calibration checked?

1 out of 1 members thought this post was helpful...

The present day spec for drift-over-time is so good that I probably wouldn't bother checking. I'd assume the performance is more than adequate after the range change. But it's your call.

Someone has already re-ranged the transmitter from 0-100m3/hr to 0-200m3/hr, so you don't call re-ranging 'calibration' (a lot of people do).

The two calibration adjustments that can be made to most smart transmitters are
- sensor trim
- current output trim

where calibration means
- compare the transmitter's pressure readings to a pressure reference standard to see if adjustment needs to be done or

- compare the current output values to a reference standard and adjust if need be."

Making the cal check requires a calibration reference sources and some means of implementing an adjustment, like a handheld communicator or pushbuttons and display, depending on the model or a reference grade current source and current calibrator.