Today is...
Monday, November 20, 2017
Welcome to Control.com, the global online
community of automation professionals.
Featured Video...
Featured Video
Watch an animation of a conveyor stacking operation demonstrating the use of a move on a gear command.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Visit our Post Archive
Advice for Interface Level Transmitter Selection
Interface level transmitter for between dirty oily water and oil for 5 meter long tank

Experts,

Please we have a tough interface level measurement application of equalization tank that has oily water in the bottom with average level of near 3000mm and on top of it an oil layer of near 300 to 500 mm. We need to measure this water interface level. Before we were using enraf servo, but it is unreliable as the water is unclean (oily water, dirt) so the stilling well was always clogging. We removed it then again the displacer giving in correct reading. So, we need to see what is the most suitable level technology that we can use for this dirty water interface lengthy tank (near 5 meter). Appreciate your professional advice.

We have used Rosemount 5300 Guided Wave Radar (GWR) for interface. If there are no internals or agitators, a stilling well would not be required. The dielectric constant of the would have to be greater than 1.4. The 5300 series is able to sense lower than 2.00 dielectric constant. Many pure oils are around 2.0 water is much higher. A nuclear interface would work also, but are much move expensive and may require a certified nuclear licensed person on site.

1 out of 1 members thought this post was helpful...

A Toroidal conductivity probe will read High if the interface is above the probe. Low if it's below, there is no doubt.

If you put the probe at the level you want to control the interface, it's a simple matter of logic to control the level of the dirty water. It will also differentiate between an emulsion layer with a conductivity reading in between.

Roy, the use a toroidal probe - that's a clever idea. Thanks for bringing it up.