M
Dear List members,
This is a question related to the SFC run-time behaviour:
We use SFC (assume there are steps STP-B-1,2,3...) to write an Action (assume the associated step is called STP-A-1) of the main SFC. When STP-A-1 is active and the sub-level SFC program goes to STP-B-2, the STP-A-1 becomes inactive. The question is: next time when STP-A-1 is active again, should the sub-level program inside the Action start from beginning or continue from the break point STP-B-2?
Best Regards,
Mark Meng
This is a question related to the SFC run-time behaviour:
We use SFC (assume there are steps STP-B-1,2,3...) to write an Action (assume the associated step is called STP-A-1) of the main SFC. When STP-A-1 is active and the sub-level SFC program goes to STP-B-2, the STP-A-1 becomes inactive. The question is: next time when STP-A-1 is active again, should the sub-level program inside the Action start from beginning or continue from the break point STP-B-2?
Best Regards,
Mark Meng