R
On Tuesday Jack suggested that we should begin preparing a centralized requirements document. Since, so far there have been no volunteers and
since I think that Jack's suggestion is a good idea (also necessary) I would be willing to make the attempt.
The only negative here is that I will be attending the Linux Expo. in Paris next week and will be back to work the following week. I won't be able to do much while I'm in France.
What do you all think?
rickj
Jack Gallagher wrote:
>
> It would be nice to have one centralized document that has all of the
> decisions that may have been made up to this point. Or at least one
> person's view of the decisions to start the conversation. From here we can
> identify what requirements are implied by these decisions. That way we
> don't lose anything. Am I way off?
---- snip ----
_______________________________________________
LinuxPLC mailing list
[email protected]
http://linuxplc.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxplc
since I think that Jack's suggestion is a good idea (also necessary) I would be willing to make the attempt.
The only negative here is that I will be attending the Linux Expo. in Paris next week and will be back to work the following week. I won't be able to do much while I'm in France.
What do you all think?
rickj
Jack Gallagher wrote:
>
> It would be nice to have one centralized document that has all of the
> decisions that may have been made up to this point. Or at least one
> person's view of the decisions to start the conversation. From here we can
> identify what requirements are implied by these decisions. That way we
> don't lose anything. Am I way off?
---- snip ----
_______________________________________________
LinuxPLC mailing list
[email protected]
http://linuxplc.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxplc