B
I recently took part in a Fieldbus Foundation presentation given by an engineering company that is currently involved in implementing a very large fieldbus foundation system (Approx 2,500 end
devices). They are facing a number of real world challenges. One of them will be Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT).
Historically on 4-20 mA systems a certain percentage of points (10% to 100%) have been stimulated during FAT. Control, display
and alarm response is then tested. The fact that each device on the fieldbus segment must be tagged and addressed correctly creates a challenge doing this. There is discussion that the FAT may be waived and the testing done at site (SAT).
It's interesting that software project implementation these days seems to be all about testing, testing and testing. Given the
increased level of software/networking in control systems I would suggest we need to be doing more testing during development not less.
What experiences are out there that could help this project? How have large profibus systems dealt with this issue?
devices). They are facing a number of real world challenges. One of them will be Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT).
Historically on 4-20 mA systems a certain percentage of points (10% to 100%) have been stimulated during FAT. Control, display
and alarm response is then tested. The fact that each device on the fieldbus segment must be tagged and addressed correctly creates a challenge doing this. There is discussion that the FAT may be waived and the testing done at site (SAT).
It's interesting that software project implementation these days seems to be all about testing, testing and testing. Given the
increased level of software/networking in control systems I would suggest we need to be doing more testing during development not less.
What experiences are out there that could help this project? How have large profibus systems dealt with this issue?