M
Curt,
While you may agree with the advice, it isn't exactly objective. Schneider owns 19% of control.com, so has a financial interest in seeing
the success of the LinuxPLC.
From the Modicon website::
"... Control.com is driving the creation of an open source PLC to run under the Linux operating system, while Schneider Electric's Transparent
Factory open automation architecture delivers a suite of web enabled products that simplifies enterprise-wide information sharing."
The complete release is at
http://public.modicon.com/Public/HomeStories.nsf/ALLSTORIES/6E8C7E785E611=0D685256943006CA340
Kind of makes you wonder who will profit from all of those volunteer hours for the LinuxPLC project...
Sincerely,
Mark Wells
President
Runfactory Systems Inc.
http://www.runfactory.com1235 Bay Street, Suite 400
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5R 3K4
Cell Ph. 416-984-0774
Fax. 416-352-5206
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curt Wuollet" <[email protected]>
> Hi Paul and all.
>
> I first wanted to remark that this is probably the most objective
> advice I've ever seen from someone with a "big automation" tag.
> Ethernet IO is a passion of mine as I see it as mission critical for
> the LPLC and hold out great hope that it can retain the good parts of
> ethernet without reverting to the failed model of proprietary excess.
>
> List Manager wrote:
> > ------------Forwarded message-------------
> > From: Paul Horvath <[email protected]>
> >
> > You may want to consider NOT writing a C/C++ app. If your objective
> > is to use remote I/O over ethernet and you have a mixed point count
> > (using momentum with large point counts isn't cost effective, WAGO
> > 750 series slice I/O is better) definitely go with a Modbus/TCP
> > compatible system.
> ....<clip>
While you may agree with the advice, it isn't exactly objective. Schneider owns 19% of control.com, so has a financial interest in seeing
the success of the LinuxPLC.
From the Modicon website::
"... Control.com is driving the creation of an open source PLC to run under the Linux operating system, while Schneider Electric's Transparent
Factory open automation architecture delivers a suite of web enabled products that simplifies enterprise-wide information sharing."
The complete release is at
http://public.modicon.com/Public/HomeStories.nsf/ALLSTORIES/6E8C7E785E611=0D685256943006CA340
Kind of makes you wonder who will profit from all of those volunteer hours for the LinuxPLC project...
Sincerely,
Mark Wells
President
Runfactory Systems Inc.
http://www.runfactory.com1235 Bay Street, Suite 400
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5R 3K4
Cell Ph. 416-984-0774
Fax. 416-352-5206
----- Original Message -----
From: "Curt Wuollet" <[email protected]>
> Hi Paul and all.
>
> I first wanted to remark that this is probably the most objective
> advice I've ever seen from someone with a "big automation" tag.
> Ethernet IO is a passion of mine as I see it as mission critical for
> the LPLC and hold out great hope that it can retain the good parts of
> ethernet without reverting to the failed model of proprietary excess.
>
> List Manager wrote:
> > ------------Forwarded message-------------
> > From: Paul Horvath <[email protected]>
> >
> > You may want to consider NOT writing a C/C++ app. If your objective
> > is to use remote I/O over ethernet and you have a mixed point count
> > (using momentum with large point counts isn't cost effective, WAGO
> > 750 series slice I/O is better) definitely go with a Modbus/TCP
> > compatible system.
> ....<clip>