Hi Community Members,
We have recently faced some outages of our 7.6MVA Steam Turbine Generator on actuation of Reverse Power Protection. I am writing here to know your expert opinions:
1. Protection Relay SIEMENS SIPROTEC 7UM62 is installed at our Generator Breaker, 02 stages of Reverse Power Protection are enabled in it.
Setpoint: -119.3 kW (-1.57% of 7.6MVA)
Time Delay (with Trip SOV operation): 50 ms
Time Delay (without Trip SOV operation): 5 sec
2. As Steam Turbine Control is entirely a local PLC based (ComAP/intellisys) which also provides some generator protections, so another Reverse power stage with following settings in enabled in that
Setpoint: -182.4kW
Time Delay: 02 sec
3. Hydraulic governor system is installed on this Steam Turbine which usually cause hunting issues leading to load fluctuation and ultimately tripping the turbine on Reverse Power Protection from ComAP controller as its time delay is lesser that Siprotec 7UM62 (without Trip SOV operation)
4. Moreover, even normal stop initiated by Operators lead to reverse power from Siprotec 7UM62with 50ms delay.
My question here is; whether its advisable to allow the machine to wait for reverse power to actually happen? Shouldn't we trip the machine before it actually experiences reverse power?
There is a function (Change in Active Power) which monitors the active power of last 3 cycles (60 msec for 50 Hz system) and allows the Siprotec to generate a trip contact in case Active Power fluctuates. Can you guide percentage of active power we may use as setpoint? So that normal load fluctuations (driven by operator) don't cause any unwanted trip.
We have recently faced some outages of our 7.6MVA Steam Turbine Generator on actuation of Reverse Power Protection. I am writing here to know your expert opinions:
1. Protection Relay SIEMENS SIPROTEC 7UM62 is installed at our Generator Breaker, 02 stages of Reverse Power Protection are enabled in it.
Setpoint: -119.3 kW (-1.57% of 7.6MVA)
Time Delay (with Trip SOV operation): 50 ms
Time Delay (without Trip SOV operation): 5 sec
2. As Steam Turbine Control is entirely a local PLC based (ComAP/intellisys) which also provides some generator protections, so another Reverse power stage with following settings in enabled in that
Setpoint: -182.4kW
Time Delay: 02 sec
3. Hydraulic governor system is installed on this Steam Turbine which usually cause hunting issues leading to load fluctuation and ultimately tripping the turbine on Reverse Power Protection from ComAP controller as its time delay is lesser that Siprotec 7UM62 (without Trip SOV operation)
4. Moreover, even normal stop initiated by Operators lead to reverse power from Siprotec 7UM62with 50ms delay.
My question here is; whether its advisable to allow the machine to wait for reverse power to actually happen? Shouldn't we trip the machine before it actually experiences reverse power?
There is a function (Change in Active Power) which monitors the active power of last 3 cycles (60 msec for 50 Hz system) and allows the Siprotec to generate a trip contact in case Active Power fluctuates. Can you guide percentage of active power we may use as setpoint? So that normal load fluctuations (driven by operator) don't cause any unwanted trip.
