Instrumentation and Process Control
Pumps and Compressors
26 questions
-
Question 1 of 26
The compressor emergency shutdown system (ESD) has tripped the natural gas compressor off-line three times in the past 24 hours. Each time the operator goes to reset the compressor interlock, she notices the graphic display panel on the interlock system says “Separator boot high level” as the reason for the trip. After this last trip, operations decides to keep the compressor shut down for a few hours until your arrival to diagnose the problem. Your first diagnostic test is to look at the indicated boot level in the sightglass (LG-93). There, you see a liquid level appears to be normal:

First, explain why this first diagnostic test was a good idea. Then, identify what would your next diagnostic test be.
Finally, comment on the decision by operations to leave the compressor shut down until your arrival. Do you think this was a good idea or a bad idea, from a diagnostic perspective? Why or why not?
Reveal answerGiven the fact that the ESD system keeps indicating a high boot level, you know that it “thinks” the liquid level inside the boot is higher than it should be. The next logical step is to determine whether or not a high liquid level condition does indeed exist. If so, the trip is legitimate and there may be a problem with the liquid level control system. If not, the LSHH-231 or its associated wiring may have a fault that sends a false trip alarm to the ESD system.
However, the decision to leave the compressor idle for a few hours until your arrival was not a good one for diagnosis. If indeed there is a problem with excessive liquid collecting in the boot, this would only be evident during running operation. With the compressor idle and no new gas entering the separator vessel, there will be no new liquid collecting in the boot, which will give the boot level control system ample time to empty that liquid down to a normal level and make it appear as though there is no level problem. In other words, leaving the compressor idle for a few hours “erases” the evidence, making it more difficult to troubleshoot.
Aside from re-starting the compressor and watching it run, you could perform a test on the liquid level control system by simulating a high-level condition inside the boot (e.g. applying pressure to one side of LT-92) and observing how fast or slow the actual liquid drains out (as indicated by LG-93). If there is a problem with the level control valve LV-92 or its associated components, you should be able to tell in the form of a long (slow) drain time. The fact that the blind flange at the bottom of the boot drain line says “Rod out” on the P&ID suggests this line is prone to plugging with debris, which could explain a slow-draining condition and consequently the frequent high-level trips.
Notes:This question is a good candidate for a “Virtual Troubleshooting” exercise. Presenting the diagram to students, you first imagine in your own mind a particular fault in the system. Then, you present one or more symptoms of that fault (something noticeable by an operator or other user of the system). Students then propose various diagnostic tests to perform on this system to identify the nature and location of the fault, as though they were technicians trying to troubleshoot the problem. Your job is to tell them what the result(s) would be for each of the proposed diagnostic tests, documenting those results where all the students can see.
During and after the exercise, it is good to ask students follow-up questions such as:
{\bullet} What does the result of the last diagnostic test tell you about the fault?
{\bullet} Suppose the results of the last diagnostic test were different. What then would that result tell you about the fault?
{\bullet} Is the last diagnostic test the best one we could do?
{\bullet} What would be the ideal order of tests, to diagnose the problem in as few steps as possible? -
Question 2 of 26
The compressor automatically shut down last night, tripped by LSHH-231. The control system alarm log showed a high level alarm LIR-92 about 15 minutes prior to the shutdown:

Identify the likelihood of each specified fault in this process. Consider each fault one at a time (i.e. no coincidental faults), determining whether or not each fault could independently account for all measurements and symptoms in this process.
$$\begin{array} {|l|l|} \hline Fault & Possible & Impossible \\ \hline 2-inch~line~plugged~at bottom~of~separator~vessel & & \\ \hline LT-92~failed~with~high~output~signal & & \\ \hline Air~supply~to~solenoid~valve~shut~off & & \\ \hline Solenoid~vent~line~plugged & & \\ \hline PSV-11~stuck~open~& & \\ \hline LSHH-231~failed~with~high~output~signal & & \\ \hline \end{array}$$
Reveal answer$$\begin{array} {|l|l|} \hline Fault & Possible & Impossible \\ \hline 2-inch~line~plugged~at bottom~of~separator~vessel & \surd & \\ \hline LT-92~failed~with~high~output~signal & & \surd \\ \hline Air~supply~to~solenoid~valve~shut~off & \surd & \\ \hline Solenoid~vent~line~plugged & & \surd \\ \hline PSV-11~stuck~open~& & \surd \\ \hline LSHH-231~failed~with~high~output~signal & & \surd \\ \hline \end{array}$$
Notes:From all the evidence, it seems we really had a high-high level condition in the separator boot, and that the shutdown system acted precisely as it was designed to do: protect the compressor from sucking in any liquid.
A good “next test” to do would be to place controller LIC-92 in manual mode and attempt to cycle control valve LV-92, while monitoring solenoid valve SV-92. If these valves function as they should, the problem may be an obstruction in the drain line. If they do not function as they should, the problem is either in one of those valves or in the wiring/tubing connecting those valves to the rest of the system.
This question is a good candidate for a “Virtual Troubleshooting” exercise. Presenting the diagram to students, you first imagine in your own mind a particular fault in the system. Then, you present one or more symptoms of that fault (something noticeable by an operator or other user of the system). Students then propose various diagnostic tests to perform on this system to identify the nature and location of the fault, as though they were technicians trying to troubleshoot the problem. Your job is to tell them what the result(s) would be for each of the proposed diagnostic tests, documenting those results where all the students can see.
During and after the exercise, it is good to ask students follow-up questions such as:
{\bullet} What does the result of the last diagnostic test tell you about the fault?
{\bullet} Suppose the results of the last diagnostic test were different. What then would that result tell you about the fault?
{\bullet} Is the last diagnostic test the best one we could do?
{\bullet} What would be the ideal order of tests, to diagnose the problem in as few steps as possible? -
Question 3 of 26
This amount of vacuum (negative pressure) in this knock-out drum is controlled by varying the compressor’s bypass valve:

An operator tells you there is a problem with this system, though: the vacuum gauge near the pressure transmitter registers -6.9 PSI, even though the controller faceplate registers -8.0 PSI which is the same as the setpoint. The same operator notes that the control valve position is approximately 30
Another instrument technician happens to be with you, and recommends the operator place the pressure controller in manual mode to “stroke-test” the control valve. Explain why this test would be a waste of time, and propose a better test for helping to pinpoint the location of the fault.
{\bullet} A valuable principle to apply in a diagnostic scenario such as this is correspondence: identifying which field variables correspond with their respective controller faceplate displays, and which do not. Apply this comparative test to the scenario described, and use it to explain why the technician’s proposed test was probably not the best first step.
{\bullet} A problem-solving technique useful for analyzing control systems is to mark the PV and SP inputs of all controllers with “+” and “-” symbols, rather than merely label each controller as “direct” or “reverse” action. Apply this technique to the control strategy shown here, identifying which controller input(s) should be labeled “+” and which controller input(s) should be labeled “-”.
{\bullet} Predict the effects resulting from one of the transmitters in this system failing with either a high or a low signal.
{\bullet} For those who have studied level measurement, explain how the level transmitter (which is nothing more than a DP transmitter) senses liquid level inside the knock-out drum.Reveal answerThe reason that the technician’s proposed test would have been a waste of time is because the issue at hand is a significant disagreement between the vacuum gauge and the controller display. No valve problem or controller output problem could cause this to happen.
A far better test would be to place the pressure controller in manual mode, then vent the pressure transmitter to check that the controller reads 0 PSI. If there is a transmitter calibration problem, it will likely appear as a zero error (not reading 0 PSI at 0 PSI).Alternatively, one could also perform the same test on the vacuum gauge to see if it is in error.
The level controller needs to be direct-acting. The pressure controller needs to be reverse-acting.
Although there is a discrepancy between the controller’s output (displayed) and the actual valve position, an error of (approximately) 1.4
